Agent skill

Design Critique Skill: Run Structured Team Crits

The design-critique skill from Owl-Listener's designer-skills gives an AI coding agent a framework to facilitate team critiques, with timed phases, feedback phrasing and action items.

Install
/plugin marketplace add Owl-Listener/designer-skills
/plugin install design-ops@designer-skills
View on GitHub

Stars, license and last push from GitHub. Install count as reported by the open skills directory.

What is the design critique skill?

The design-critique skill, listed here as owl-design-critique, is a SKILL.md in the design-ops plugin of Owl-Listener's designer-skills repository. It helps an agent facilitate a team critique with framing, feedback rules and actionable outcomes. It is for sessions with people in the room, not solo expert reviews.

The design-critique skill belongs to the design-ops plugin in Owl-Listener's designer-skills repository. This page uses the slug owl-design-critique to tell it apart from other critique tools. The skill itself is named design-critique in its SKILL.md.

Its description limits it to sessions with people in the room. For a solo expert review it names heuristic-evaluation from the prototyping-testing plugin, so the two do not overlap.

The session structure it prescribes

  1. Before: the designer shares goals, constraints, target audience and stage, and says what feedback is needed.
  2. Present: five minutes for the designer to walk through the work and goals.
  3. Clarify: five minutes of questions meant to understand, not judge.
  4. Feedback rounds, structured by category or priority.
  5. Discuss the key tensions, then capture decisions and action items.

Feedback phrasing and critique types

Feedback follows four openers: I notice, I wonder, What if, and I think because. The skill also names four formats: desk crit, team crit, cross-team crit and stakeholder review, each with its own purpose.

Who the design critique skill is for

Best for

  • Teams that want an agent to structure a critique into before, during and after steps with set ground rules.
  • Turning messy opinions into action items with owners and deadlines after a review.

Not for

  • Judging a screen by itself. The skill facilitates people and does not inspect pixels or code.
  • Solo expert reviews, which the file hands to heuristic-evaluation.

Use it with UiChemy

A critique ends with a list of changes to make. Once the team agrees, apply them in UiChemy Composer, which edits the page visually inside Elementor or Gutenberg, or re-run Figma to WordPress on the revised file. Click Get Started on uichemy.com. Related pages: critique, impeccable-audit and web-design-guidelines.